How ScheduleLens compares

Each tool below is built for a different job. ScheduleLens is for the PM who receives the programme: quality checks, forensic delay analysis, and the integrity checks that catch a gamed update, per report, in minutes. Pick a tool to see the head-to-head.

ScheduleLens vs. Acumen Fuse vs. a manual analyst

Feature by feature against the desktop incumbent and the consultant route.

Feature ScheduleLens Acumen Fuse Manual Analyst
Web-based (no install) Yes No No
XER file support Yes Yes Yes
P6 XML support Yes Yes Yes
MS Project support XML + .mpp Yes Yes
Asta Powerproject support .pp upload Powerproject integration Yes
Automated schedule health check Yes Yes No
Forensic delay analysis Yes Half-step analysis Yes
Change detection between updates Yes Yes Yes
Scheduling-mode change + concealed-slip checks Yes Not advertised Yes
Re-baseline (multi-baseline) tracking Yes Not advertised Yes
Cross-update trend tracking Yes Yes Yes
Grounded Q&A over the results Yes Not advertised No
AI-generated narratives Yes Not advertised No
PDF report output Yes Yes Yes
Pay-per-use pricing Yes No No
Usable without training Yes Specialist tool No
Results in minutes Yes Yes No
Where your file goes Deleted after processing Stays on your PC With the analyst
Starting price $29 Quote, per user $2,000+

Acumen Fuse capabilities are taken from Deltek's product pages and documentation (September 2026); “Not advertised” means Deltek's public material doesn't mention it, not that the feature is missing. Deltek does not publish pricing. Acumen Risk & 360 is Deltek's separate schedule-risk product. Manual analyst costs vary by region and scope. Manual analysts can perform integrity, re-baseline, and trend work; the checkmark means a skilled analyst can, by hand and over weeks, not that a tool does it for you.

Ready to switch?

Try ScheduleLens with your own schedule file, with no commitment.

Get started free